Lifestyle Medicine Analysed – Poorly

An article in the British Journal of General Practice published online, on the 29th April 2021, sets out a mixture of support, disdain and implied ineffectiveness of the role that lifestyle medicine[1] has in the restoration and generation of human health. The direct journal response online allows only for 350 words. A fuller response is found below.

Clinical Diagnosis of Probable Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis of the Boston Criteria

Lifestyle Medicine Analysed - Poorly

Doctors are ageist — and it's harming older patients

Topological data analysis in biomedicine: A review - ScienceDirect

How to Spot False Claims in Your Wellness Products - The New York Times

JCM, Free Full-Text

Lifestyle Medicine Analysed – Poorly

Effectiveness, reach, uptake, and feasibility of digital health interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomised controlled trials - The Lancet Digital Health

Insurance Risk Class Definition and Associated Premium Costs

Medicina, Free Full-Text

Precision Medicine: New Paradigms, Risks and Opportunities - Knowledge at Wharton

Health and Wellness Market Size To Reach USD 8,945.3 Bn by 2032

Supporting the self-management of hypertension: Patients' experiences of using a mobile phone-based system

Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard - eBioMedicine